Talk:Arithmetic

Numeralization
Don't you think "numeralization of the null concept" should be changed to "invention of zero"? If not, I think at least "numeralization of the null concept (invention of zero)" should be written instead. This would be much clearer. A.Z.

"Arithmetiq" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arithmetiq. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

"Arithmetique" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arithmetique. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Fundamental theorem of arithmetic
I added a link to the Ingenpedia page of Fundamental theorem of arithmetic for related topics, but should I mention it in the article itself (such as adding a new section, mentioning it in a existing section or adding a subsection)? Andrew.qiu266 (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree that this belongs to this article. IMO, the best would be to add a fifth subsection to the section "Arithmetic operations". This subsection could be entitled "Divisibility and factorization", and should contain the basic tools that allow stating and explaining the fundamental theorem. D.Lazard (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it would be better to create a new section for "Fundamental theorem of arithmetic" after "Arithmetic operations" because it doesn't really fit in the section.Andrew.qiu266 (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it would be better to create a new section for "Fundamental theorem of arithmetic" after "Arithmetic operations" because it doesn't really fit in the section.Andrew.qiu266 (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * This is also a good option. However, I a not sure that "Fundamental theorem of arithmetic" would be the best title. In fact, for stating the theorem, you will need to introduce some fundamental auxiliary concepts such as divisibility, prime numbers, ... So, if I would write this section, I would call it "Fundamental results". However, that is the creator of a section who knows what he intends to put in it and is best placed for choosing the title. D.Lazard (talk) 08:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

"modus Indoram"?
should this be "modus Indorum"? which would mean "the mode of the Indians" "Modus Indoram" doesn't parse. --142.163.194.153 (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I believe so, yes. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)