Texas divisionism

Texas divisionism is a mainly historical movement that advocates the division of the U.S. state of Texas into as many as five states, as some considered to be statutorily permitted by a provision included in the resolution admitting the former Republic of Texas into the Union in 1845.

Texas divisionists argue that the division of their state could be desirable because, as the second-largest and second most-populous state in the U.S., Texas is too large to be governed efficiently as one political unit, or that in several states Texans would gain more power at the federal level, particularly in the U.S. Senate, where each state elects two Senators, and by extension in the Electoral College, in which each state gets two electoral votes for their Senators in addition to an electoral vote for each Representative. However, others argue that division may be wastefully duplicative, requiring a new state government for each new state.

Federal constitutional process
Article IV, Section 3 of the United States Constitution expressly prohibits any other state from dividing up and forming smaller states without Congressional approval. The relevant clause says "New states may be admitted by the Congress into this union; but no new states shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state; nor any state be formed by the junction of two or more states, or parts of states, without the consent of the legislatures of the states concerned as well as of the Congress".

The Joint Resolution for Annexing Texas to the United States, approved by Congress on March 1, 1845, states: "Third – New States of convenient size not exceeding four in number, in addition to said State of Texas and having sufficient population, may, hereafter by the consent of said State, be formed out of the territory thereof, which shall be entitled to admission under the provisions of the Federal Constitution; and such states as may be formed out of the territory lying south of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, commonly known as the Missouri Compromise Line, shall be admitted into the Union, with or without slavery, as the people of each State, asking admission shall desire; and in such State or States as shall be formed out of said territory, north of said Missouri Compromise Line, slavery, or involuntary servitude (except for crime) shall be prohibited."

Proponents of the right of Texas to divide itself in order to create new states without Congressional approval argue that the resolution of 1845, a bill which passed both houses of Congress, stands as Congressional "pre-approval" under the terms of the Constitution for formation of such new states. This interpretation of the statute is disputed by opponents.

Opponents argue that there was no such "pre-approval" granted to Texas by Congress within the statute and that the Constitution requires future Congressional approval of any new states that are proposed to be formed from what is now the state of Texas. According to opponents, the statute does not grant Texas any Congressional "pre-approval" for partition, rather the statute simply limits the number of new states that could be carved out of the annexed Texas territory as to not exceed four.

Opponents also argue that the statute has also been overridden and rendered moot by later legislation that was enacted by Congress, namely, the Act which admitted Texas into the Union as a state. The text of the subsequent Texas Admission Act signed on 29 December 1845, states that Texas would be admitted to the Union "on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatever", which moots any supposed special right for Texas to divide itself up into five states without the future approval of Congress in accordance to Article V, Section 3 of the Constitution.

Legislative efforts
The division of the state of Texas was frequently proposed in the early decades of Texan statehood, particularly in the decades immediately prior to and following the American Civil War.

Compromise of 1850 debates
In the Compromise of 1850 debates, Tennessee Senator John Bell proposed division into two southern states, with the assent of Texas, in February 1850. New Mexico would get all Texas land north of the 34th parallel north, including today's Texas Panhandle, while the area to the south, including the southeastern part of today's New Mexico, would be divided at the Colorado River of Texas into two Southern states, balancing the admission of California and New Mexico as free states.

State of Lincoln
The State of Lincoln was proposed in 1869, to be carved out of the territory of Texas from the area south and west of the state's Colorado River. Unlike many other Texas division proposals of the Reconstruction period, this one was presented to Congress, but the state legislature did not take final action.

State of Jefferson
A bill was introduced in the Texas legislature in 1915 to create a State of Jefferson, made up of the Texas Panhandle.

Texlahoma
In 1935, in response to what proponents felt was lack of state attention to road infrastructure, A. P. Sights proposed that 46 northern Texas counties and 23 western Oklahoma counties secede to form a new, roughly rectangular state called Texlahoma.

Considerations
In 2009 Nate Silver wrote that a division could slightly help Republicans in the Senate while slightly hurting them in the Electoral College, concluding that there is not much rationale for either political party to support such a division.