Ingenpedia:In the news/Candidates/header

This page provides a forum for editors to suggest items for inclusion in Template:In the news (ITN), a protected Main Page template, as well as the forum for discussion of candidates. This is not the page to report errors in the ITN section on the Main Page&mdash;please go to the appropriate section at IN:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. Under each daily section header below is the transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day (with a light green header). Each day's portal page is followed by a subsection for suggestions and discussion.

 {|
 * style="background:#e6f2ff; border:1px solid #a3b1bf; padding:1em; vertical-align:top; "|

How to nominate an item
In order to suggest a candidate:
 * Update an article to be linked to from the blurb to include the recent developments, or find an article that has already been updated.
 * Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated).
 * Do not add sections for new dates. These are automatically generated (at midnight UTC) by a bot; creating them manually breaks this process.
 * Nominate the blurb for ITN inclusion under the "Suggestions" subheading for the date, emboldening the link in the blurb to the updated article. Use a level 4 header (====) when doing so.
 * Preferably use the template ITN candidate to nominate the article related to the event in the news. Make sure that you include a reference from a verifiable, reliable secondary source. Press releases are not acceptable. The suggested blurb should be written in simple present tense.
 * Adding an explanation why the event should be posted greatly increases the odds of posting.
 * Please consider alerting editors to the nomination by adding the template ITN note to the corresponding article's talk page.

There are criteria which guide the decision on whether or not to put a particular item on In the news, based largely on the extensiveness of the updated content and the perceived significance of the recent developments. These are listed at IN:ITN.

Submissions that do not follow the guidelines at Ingenpedia:In the news will not be placed onto the live template.

Headers

 * Items that have been posted or pulled from the main page are generally marked with (Posted) or (Pulled) in the item's subject so it is clear they are no longer active.
 * Items can also be marked as (Ready) when the article is both updated and there seems to be a consensus to post. The posting admin, however, should always judge the update and the consensus to post themselves. If you find an entry that you don't feel is ready to post is marked (Ready), you should remove the mark in the header.

Voicing an opinion on an item

 * Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.
 * Some jargon: RD refers to "recent deaths", a subsection of the news box which lists only the names of the recent notable deceased. Blurb refers to the full sentences that occupy most of the news box. Most eligible deaths will be listed in the recent deaths section of the ITN template. However, some deaths may be given a full listing if there is sufficient consensus to do so.
 * The blurb of a promoted ITN item may be modified to complement the existing items on the main page.

Please do not...

 * 1) add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are usually not helpful. Instead, explain the reasons why you think the item meets or does not meet the ITN inclusion criteria so a consensus can be reached.
 * 2) oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive.
 * 3) accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). Conflicts of interest are not handled at ITN.
 * 4) comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
 * 5) oppose a IN:ITN/R item here because you disagree with current IN:ITN/R criteria (these can be discussed at the relevant Talk Page)
 * }